<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 166 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413114</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted as the allotment of shares was found to be proportionate and constituted a genuine business transaction, not falling under the anti-abuse provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(c)(ii) of the Income-tax Act. The decision was pronounced on 1st October 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 166 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413114</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted as the allotment of shares was found to be proportionate and constituted a genuine business transaction, not falling under the anti-abuse provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(c)(ii) of the Income-tax Act. The decision was pronounced on 1st October 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>