<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 165 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the appellate order dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution and remitted the matter back to the ld. CIT(A) for fresh consideration, emphasizing the importance of providing the assessee with an opportunity to present detailed explanations. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the significance of upholding principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 08:41:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 165 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the appellate order dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution and remitted the matter back to the ld. CIT(A) for fresh consideration, emphasizing the importance of providing the assessee with an opportunity to present detailed explanations. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the significance of upholding principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>