<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 157 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413105</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both applications seeking an extension of time for payment of the first installment due, as the petitioner withdrew the application. Costs of Rs. 10,000 each were imposed on the dismissed applications. The judgment emphasized the importance of honoring commitments made in previous court orders and highlighted potential legal remedies available to the respondent if payments were not made as directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 20:57:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 157 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413105</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both applications seeking an extension of time for payment of the first installment due, as the petitioner withdrew the application. Costs of Rs. 10,000 each were imposed on the dismissed applications. The judgment emphasized the importance of honoring commitments made in previous court orders and highlighted potential legal remedies available to the respondent if payments were not made as directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>