<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1548 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297999</link>
    <description>Preventive detention under the Telangana Act must rest on relevant material showing a live and proximate nexus with the need to prevent future prejudicial conduct. Stale antecedent cases, especially where they resulted in acquittal, compromise, or were not truly relied upon, cannot support the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction. Continued detention also depends on strict compliance with the statutory confirmation mechanism after Advisory Board proceedings; where confirmation was not duly established or served, the detention cannot be sustained. The detention failed on both substantive relevance and procedural compliance, and relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1548 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297999</link>
      <description>Preventive detention under the Telangana Act must rest on relevant material showing a live and proximate nexus with the need to prevent future prejudicial conduct. Stale antecedent cases, especially where they resulted in acquittal, compromise, or were not truly relied upon, cannot support the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction. Continued detention also depends on strict compliance with the statutory confirmation mechanism after Advisory Board proceedings; where confirmation was not duly established or served, the detention cannot be sustained. The detention failed on both substantive relevance and procedural compliance, and relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>