https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297998 Review jurisdiction under Article 137 read with Order XLVII is narrow and is confined to discovery of new material, an error apparent on the face of the record, or similar sufficient reason; it cannot be used to reargue issues already decided. On that basis, the review challenge to the earlier Sabarimala Constitution Bench judgment failed. A direct writ petition under Article 32 attacking that binding judgment was held not maintainable, and the constitutional duty of authorities to act in aid of the Supreme Court was emphasised. The collateral writ proceedings were dismissed, with directions for publicity, compliance, and maintenance of public order. en-us Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Aug 2024 16:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297998 Review jurisdiction under Article 137 read with Order XLVII is narrow and is confined to discovery of new material, an error apparent on the face of the record, or similar sufficient reason; it cannot be used to reargue issues already decided. On that basis, the review challenge to the earlier Sabarimala Constitution Bench judgment failed. A direct writ petition under Article 32 attacking that binding judgment was held not maintainable, and the constitutional duty of authorities to act in aid of the Supreme Court was emphasised. The collateral writ proceedings were dismissed, with directions for publicity, compliance, and maintenance of public order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297998