https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413085 Supreme Court directions requiring the CLB to decide the company petition were held to override earlier High Court directions made to aid adjudication, so the High Court would not proceed further with the Section 340 Cr.P.C. petition. Enforcement and contempt relief linked to the 16.8.2010 order was also declined, as a coordinate Bench had already dismissed an earlier application on the same subject and found no case for contempt. The pending compliance applications were directed to be placed before the same Judge who disposed of the earlier enforcement application for consideration. en-us Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Oct 2021 09:01:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413085 Supreme Court directions requiring the CLB to decide the company petition were held to override earlier High Court directions made to aid adjudication, so the High Court would not proceed further with the Section 340 Cr.P.C. petition. Enforcement and contempt relief linked to the 16.8.2010 order was also declined, as a coordinate Bench had already dismissed an earlier application on the same subject and found no case for contempt. The pending compliance applications were directed to be placed before the same Judge who disposed of the earlier enforcement application for consideration. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413085