<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 136 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413084</link>
    <description>The court quashed and set aside the detention order dated 15.01.2021 as it did not meet the legal requirements for preventive detention. The grounds for detention were deemed stale, illusory, and lacked a real nexus with the need for detention. The delay in passing the order and the petitioner&#039;s medical condition further invalidated the detention. Consequently, the court directed the immediate release of the petitioner from custody unless required in any other matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 09:01:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 136 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413084</link>
      <description>The court quashed and set aside the detention order dated 15.01.2021 as it did not meet the legal requirements for preventive detention. The grounds for detention were deemed stale, illusory, and lacked a real nexus with the need for detention. The delay in passing the order and the petitioner&#039;s medical condition further invalidated the detention. Consequently, the court directed the immediate release of the petitioner from custody unless required in any other matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>