https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413083 In a sunset review of anti-dumping duty, the Designated Authority's findings under Rule 17(1)(b) of the Anti-Dumping Rules, 1995 were stated to be recommendatory, with the final determination resting with the Central Government. The petitioner's status was treated as both importer and consumer, so a user questionnaire response was considered relevant instead of an import questionnaire response. The Central Government was requested to examine whether the petitioner's import questionnaire response and other representations had to be given due consideration before making the final determination. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with the matter left for consideration in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 29 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Oct 2021 09:01:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413083 In a sunset review of anti-dumping duty, the Designated Authority's findings under Rule 17(1)(b) of the Anti-Dumping Rules, 1995 were stated to be recommendatory, with the final determination resting with the Central Government. The petitioner's status was treated as both importer and consumer, so a user questionnaire response was considered relevant instead of an import questionnaire response. The Central Government was requested to examine whether the petitioner's import questionnaire response and other representations had to be given due consideration before making the final determination. The writ petition was disposed of on that basis, with the matter left for consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 29 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413083