https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413081 Regular bail was granted in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 because the petitioner had complied with the interim bail conditions, including furnishing the bank guarantee. The investigation had been completed, the complaint had been filed, and proceedings under Section 74 had been initiated. As the case was based mainly on documentary evidence and the petitioner had already spent a substantial period in custody, the Court found that returning him to custody would serve no purpose. The interim bail order was therefore made absolute. en-us Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 15:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413081 Regular bail was granted in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 because the petitioner had complied with the interim bail conditions, including furnishing the bank guarantee. The investigation had been completed, the complaint had been filed, and proceedings under Section 74 had been initiated. As the case was based mainly on documentary evidence and the petitioner had already spent a substantial period in custody, the Court found that returning him to custody would serve no purpose. The interim bail order was therefore made absolute. Case-Laws GST Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413081