https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413072 The court issued notice to the respondent/revenue for a counter-affidavit within four weeks, directing them to specify the amounts paid by the petitioner towards service tax and cess during specific periods. A stay was ordered on the operation of the impugned order until the next hearing. The court acknowledged the flaws in the order, including jurisdictional issues, procedural irregularities, scope of remand orders, inaccuracies in notices, and refund claims, ensuring a detailed examination of the legal aspects involved. en-us Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Oct 2021 09:00:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413072 The court issued notice to the respondent/revenue for a counter-affidavit within four weeks, directing them to specify the amounts paid by the petitioner towards service tax and cess during specific periods. A stay was ordered on the operation of the impugned order until the next hearing. The court acknowledged the flaws in the order, including jurisdictional issues, procedural irregularities, scope of remand orders, inaccuracies in notices, and refund claims, ensuring a detailed examination of the legal aspects involved. Case-Laws GST Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413072