<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 120 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413068</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging a summon issued by the Customs Department, citing that the petitioner&#039;s concerns regarding simultaneous adjudication and criminal proceedings were unfounded under the Customs Act. The court clarified the distinct nature and purposes of adjudication and criminal proceedings, emphasizing different outcomes and rejecting claims of potential prejudice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 120 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413068</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging a summon issued by the Customs Department, citing that the petitioner&#039;s concerns regarding simultaneous adjudication and criminal proceedings were unfounded under the Customs Act. The court clarified the distinct nature and purposes of adjudication and criminal proceedings, emphasizing different outcomes and rejecting claims of potential prejudice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>