<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 117 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413065</link>
    <description>A resolution plan binds only to reliefs and waivers expressly approved in it; a waiver of power dues up to approval did not extend to security deposit for future enhanced contract demand or 132 KV supply, so those later requests remained subject to the applicable electricity regulations. The Tribunal also stated that unpaid electricity dues arising during the CIRP period form part of CIRP costs, while dues arising after the moratorium are payable by the corporate debtor under the governing law. In the absence of any specific order granting waiver of the future security deposit and related charges, the impugned approval was unsustainable to that extent and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2021 09:00:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 117 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413065</link>
      <description>A resolution plan binds only to reliefs and waivers expressly approved in it; a waiver of power dues up to approval did not extend to security deposit for future enhanced contract demand or 132 KV supply, so those later requests remained subject to the applicable electricity regulations. The Tribunal also stated that unpaid electricity dues arising during the CIRP period form part of CIRP costs, while dues arising after the moratorium are payable by the corporate debtor under the governing law. In the absence of any specific order granting waiver of the future security deposit and related charges, the impugned approval was unsustainable to that extent and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>