<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 7 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26751</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to impose a penalty under section 271(1)(c) due to an invalid reference made after the deletion of section 274(2) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, deeming the penalty order as legally flawed. Each party was directed to bear their own costs in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:43:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 7 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26751</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to impose a penalty under section 271(1)(c) due to an invalid reference made after the deletion of section 274(2) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, deeming the penalty order as legally flawed. Each party was directed to bear their own costs in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>