https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413014 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the Assessing Officer failed to prove that inaccurate particulars of income were furnished. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed by the AO and upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The appellant's appeal was allowed, and the judgment was delivered on September 30, 2021. en-us Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Oct 2021 08:55:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413014 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the Assessing Officer failed to prove that inaccurate particulars of income were furnished. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed by the AO and upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The appellant's appeal was allowed, and the judgment was delivered on September 30, 2021. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=413014