<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1268 - Allahabad High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297977</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was declined where investigation had concluded, the charge-sheet had been filed, and cognizance had already been taken, yet the accused failed to appear despite repeated bailable and non-bailable warrants. The Court treated the seriousness of the allegations, including a demand for bribe, the applicant&#039;s position as Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, and recovery of the alleged bribe from a co-accused as relevant factors. On that record, the Court held that the applicant&#039;s conduct and the gravity of the accusations did not justify exercise of discretionary protection from arrest, and anticipatory bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:01:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1268 - Allahabad High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297977</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was declined where investigation had concluded, the charge-sheet had been filed, and cognizance had already been taken, yet the accused failed to appear despite repeated bailable and non-bailable warrants. The Court treated the seriousness of the allegations, including a demand for bribe, the applicant&#039;s position as Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, and recovery of the alleged bribe from a co-accused as relevant factors. On that record, the Court held that the applicant&#039;s conduct and the gravity of the accusations did not justify exercise of discretionary protection from arrest, and anticipatory bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>