https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297977 The High Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of an Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner in a corruption case involving allegations under sections 120-B IPC and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Despite the grant of regular bail to co-accused, the Court found the seriousness of the allegations, the applicant's conduct, and his failure to appear before the court as reasons to deny bail. Emphasizing the recovery of a significant amount from a co-accused, the Court concluded that due to the nature of the allegations and the applicant's position, anticipatory bail was not warranted. en-us Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:01:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297977 The High Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of an Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner in a corruption case involving allegations under sections 120-B IPC and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Despite the grant of regular bail to co-accused, the Court found the seriousness of the allegations, the applicant's conduct, and his failure to appear before the court as reasons to deny bail. Emphasizing the recovery of a significant amount from a co-accused, the Court concluded that due to the nature of the allegations and the applicant's position, anticipatory bail was not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297977