<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1276 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297959</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under section 438 CrPC was treated as unavailable against a warrant issued by the Magistrate during trial in proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, because section 438 applies to apprehended arrest for a non-bailable offence and the cheque dishonour offence is bailable. A warrant under section 70 CrPC is a process to secure appearance and continues until cancelled by the issuing court under section 70(2). The proper course was to seek cancellation before the same court; the warrant could also be challenged under section 482 CrPC or writ jurisdiction, but not through anticipatory bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:00:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1276 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297959</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under section 438 CrPC was treated as unavailable against a warrant issued by the Magistrate during trial in proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, because section 438 applies to apprehended arrest for a non-bailable offence and the cheque dishonour offence is bailable. A warrant under section 70 CrPC is a process to secure appearance and continues until cancelled by the issuing court under section 70(2). The proper course was to seek cancellation before the same court; the warrant could also be challenged under section 482 CrPC or writ jurisdiction, but not through anticipatory bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>