<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1699 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297956</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to treat the income from share transactions as capital gains based on the precedent set by the ITAT&#039;s earlier ruling in the assessee&#039;s case. The judgment underscores the significance of factual consistency and precedent in tax assessments, emphasizing the binding nature of prior decisions in similar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:00:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1699 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297956</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to treat the income from share transactions as capital gains based on the precedent set by the ITAT&#039;s earlier ruling in the assessee&#039;s case. The judgment underscores the significance of factual consistency and precedent in tax assessments, emphasizing the binding nature of prior decisions in similar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>