https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297965 In a complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the Rajasthan HC considered anticipatory bail in light of the petitioner's summoning, the status of the main accused, the pendency of proceedings, and the petitioner's willingness to surrender and face trial. The Court directed that if the petitioner surrendered before the trial court within ten days, he would be released on bail subject to that court's satisfaction. The disposition therefore turned on surrender and compliance with the trial court's bail conditions rather than an unconditional grant of anticipatory bail. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:00:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297965 In a complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the Rajasthan HC considered anticipatory bail in light of the petitioner's summoning, the status of the main accused, the pendency of proceedings, and the petitioner's willingness to surrender and face trial. The Court directed that if the petitioner surrendered before the trial court within ten days, he would be released on bail subject to that court's satisfaction. The disposition therefore turned on surrender and compliance with the trial court's bail conditions rather than an unconditional grant of anticipatory bail. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297965