<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 785 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297971</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the bail applications of the accused applicants involved in money laundering and corruption in the mining department of the State Government of Rajasthan. The decision was based on their significant roles in the crime, strong evidence linking them to the offense, evasion of trial, and the serious nature of the economic offense. The court emphasized that bail cannot be granted solely based on parity with co-accused persons and highlighted the importance of assessing each case independently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:00:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 785 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297971</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the bail applications of the accused applicants involved in money laundering and corruption in the mining department of the State Government of Rajasthan. The decision was based on their significant roles in the crime, strong evidence linking them to the offense, evasion of trial, and the serious nature of the economic offense. The court emphasized that bail cannot be granted solely based on parity with co-accused persons and highlighted the importance of assessing each case independently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>