<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 785 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297971</link>
    <description>Bail in a money-laundering prosecution was assessed on the accused&#039;s individual role, the collected material, and the statutory restraint under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, rather than on parity alone. The record disclosed a prima facie case, including a central role attributed to one applicant and a significant facilitating role attributed to the other. Co-accused who obtained bail were treated as differently placed because they had surrendered within time. The plea based on bail in the scheduled offence or non-arrest during investigation was found untenable on these facts, and the bail applications were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:00:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 785 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297971</link>
      <description>Bail in a money-laundering prosecution was assessed on the accused&#039;s individual role, the collected material, and the statutory restraint under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, rather than on parity alone. The record disclosed a prima facie case, including a central role attributed to one applicant and a significant facilitating role attributed to the other. Co-accused who obtained bail were treated as differently placed because they had surrendered within time. The plea based on bail in the scheduled offence or non-arrest during investigation was found untenable on these facts, and the bail applications were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>