https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297975 The Supreme Court declined to interfere in the ongoing custody proceedings and dismissed the Special Leave Petition, finding no sufficient basis on the material before it to grant the relief sought. The Court noted the presence of co-accused already in custody and also recorded the petitioner's medical condition, but held that these did not justify intervention. As a protective observation, the Court stated that if the petitioner is taken into custody, immediate medical attention must be provided if required. en-us Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:00:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297975 The Supreme Court declined to interfere in the ongoing custody proceedings and dismissed the Special Leave Petition, finding no sufficient basis on the material before it to grant the relief sought. The Court noted the presence of co-accused already in custody and also recorded the petitioner's medical condition, but held that these did not justify intervention. As a protective observation, the Court stated that if the petitioner is taken into custody, immediate medical attention must be provided if required. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297975