<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 335 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297953</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the decree of the lower appellate court in favor of the appellants. The Court clarified that the provisions of the Benami Transaction Act, including Section 4(2), apply to pending proceedings, prohibiting the defense raised by the contesting parties regarding the benami nature of the sale transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 335 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297953</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the decree of the lower appellate court in favor of the appellants. The Court clarified that the provisions of the Benami Transaction Act, including Section 4(2), apply to pending proceedings, prohibiting the defense raised by the contesting parties regarding the benami nature of the sale transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>