<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 39 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412987</link>
    <description>Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules is an independent administrative action taken on the competent authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction in public interest. It is not punitive, carries no stigma, and does not attract natural justice in the same manner as disciplinary action. Judicial review is limited to examining mala fides, arbitrariness, perversity, or non-application of mind, and the entire service record may be considered, including adverse material and conduct. On the facts, the Review Committee had examined the complete record, and the challenge based on legal malice, procedural illegality, delay, arbitrariness, or breach of assurance failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 39 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412987</link>
      <description>Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules is an independent administrative action taken on the competent authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction in public interest. It is not punitive, carries no stigma, and does not attract natural justice in the same manner as disciplinary action. Judicial review is limited to examining mala fides, arbitrariness, perversity, or non-application of mind, and the entire service record may be considered, including adverse material and conduct. On the facts, the Review Committee had examined the complete record, and the challenge based on legal malice, procedural illegality, delay, arbitrariness, or breach of assurance failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>