<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 31 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412979</link>
    <description>A complaint alleging cheque dishonour, service of demand notice, non-payment, and related assault and threats on demand for payment was held to disclose a prima facie case under the Negotiable Instruments Act and connected penal provisions. Applying the settled standard for quashing, the High Court noted that inherent jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly and only where the complaint, read as a whole, fails to disclose an offence or is manifestly frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process. On the pleaded facts, the complaint and the order issuing process were found proper, and interference was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 31 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412979</link>
      <description>A complaint alleging cheque dishonour, service of demand notice, non-payment, and related assault and threats on demand for payment was held to disclose a prima facie case under the Negotiable Instruments Act and connected penal provisions. Applying the settled standard for quashing, the High Court noted that inherent jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly and only where the complaint, read as a whole, fails to disclose an offence or is manifestly frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process. On the pleaded facts, the complaint and the order issuing process were found proper, and interference was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>