<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 19 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee on all issues. The additions of cash deposits during demonetization, long term capital gains, and profit from the sale of a car were deleted as they were explained or accounted for in the books of accounts. The Tribunal also ruled that no further inquiries were necessary regarding additional information filed by the assessee and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:34:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 19 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee on all issues. The additions of cash deposits during demonetization, long term capital gains, and profit from the sale of a car were deleted as they were explained or accounted for in the books of accounts. The Tribunal also ruled that no further inquiries were necessary regarding additional information filed by the assessee and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>