<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 4 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to unintentional circumstances. The assessment order was revised under section 263 to treat cash deposits as unexplained credits, but the Tribunal found the original assessment not erroneous and the Revenue&#039;s interest not prejudiced. Consequently, the order under section 263 was set aside, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 4 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to unintentional circumstances. The assessment order was revised under section 263 to treat cash deposits as unexplained credits, but the Tribunal found the original assessment not erroneous and the Revenue&#039;s interest not prejudiced. Consequently, the order under section 263 was set aside, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>