<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1636 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297943</link>
    <description>Arrest warrants issued at the first instance to secure the petitioner&#039;s appearance in a complaint case were considered unwarranted, and a lesser coercive process was found appropriate. Exercising inherent powers, the Court accepted the request for conversion of the warrants and directed that the arrest warrants be treated as bailable warrants. The operative effect was to moderate the mode of summoning while preserving the court&#039;s process in the complaint proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 08:32:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1636 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297943</link>
      <description>Arrest warrants issued at the first instance to secure the petitioner&#039;s appearance in a complaint case were considered unwarranted, and a lesser coercive process was found appropriate. Exercising inherent powers, the Court accepted the request for conversion of the warrants and directed that the arrest warrants be treated as bailable warrants. The operative effect was to moderate the mode of summoning while preserving the court&#039;s process in the complaint proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>