<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1621 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297928</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. The reassessment proceedings were found to be invalid due to lack of independent application of mind by the AO, non-compliance with statutory requirements, violation of principles of natural justice, and illegal additions made under Section 68. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to independently verify information and record detailed reasons before reopening an assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1621 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297928</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment order and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. The reassessment proceedings were found to be invalid due to lack of independent application of mind by the AO, non-compliance with statutory requirements, violation of principles of natural justice, and illegal additions made under Section 68. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to independently verify information and record detailed reasons before reopening an assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>