<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 695 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297932</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the assessment of income based on alleged bogus purchases. The ITAT directed the AO to estimate the income at 3% of the alleged purchases, considering the assessee had already declared a GP ratio. This decision overturned the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s addition of Rs. 12,43,645 at a rate of 16% for the bogus purchases. The assessee&#039;s income assessment for the Assessment Year 2010-11 was thus adjusted accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 21:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 695 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297932</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the assessment of income based on alleged bogus purchases. The ITAT directed the AO to estimate the income at 3% of the alleged purchases, considering the assessee had already declared a GP ratio. This decision overturned the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s addition of Rs. 12,43,645 at a rate of 16% for the bogus purchases. The assessee&#039;s income assessment for the Assessment Year 2010-11 was thus adjusted accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>