https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297924 Section 18 references under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 depend on non-acceptance of the award, a written objection, and compliance with the prescribed limitation period; actual or constructive knowledge of the award may fix the starting point for time, and oral protest alone is not enough unless the statutory requirements are otherwise satisfied. The judgment also notes that a landowners' association is not the primary claimant for compensation, and that writ or equitable jurisdiction cannot ordinarily be used to bypass statutory deadlines or revive stale claims, except in rare cases of coercion, waiver, or similarly compelling circumstances. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:46:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297924 Section 18 references under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 depend on non-acceptance of the award, a written objection, and compliance with the prescribed limitation period; actual or constructive knowledge of the award may fix the starting point for time, and oral protest alone is not enough unless the statutory requirements are otherwise satisfied. The judgment also notes that a landowners' association is not the primary claimant for compensation, and that writ or equitable jurisdiction cannot ordinarily be used to bypass statutory deadlines or revive stale claims, except in rare cases of coercion, waiver, or similarly compelling circumstances. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297924