<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1224 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297918</link>
    <description>A warrant affecting personal liberty must be issued only after judicious consideration of the facts, and summons or a bailable warrant should ordinarily be preferred; on the facts described, the non-bailable warrant and its execution were held unjustified because lesser measures were available and the manner of execution was unduly hasty. Public law compensation for humiliation or wrongful detention may be granted for violation of personal liberty, but no further compensation was warranted here because the appellant had already obtained relief and some responsibility lay with him. The absence of the exact words &quot;non-bailable&quot; from Sections 70 and 71 of the Code did not invalidate the warrant, since the expression is merely descriptive of the process and the court&#039;s jurisdiction remained intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1224 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297918</link>
      <description>A warrant affecting personal liberty must be issued only after judicious consideration of the facts, and summons or a bailable warrant should ordinarily be preferred; on the facts described, the non-bailable warrant and its execution were held unjustified because lesser measures were available and the manner of execution was unduly hasty. Public law compensation for humiliation or wrongful detention may be granted for violation of personal liberty, but no further compensation was warranted here because the appellant had already obtained relief and some responsibility lay with him. The absence of the exact words &quot;non-bailable&quot; from Sections 70 and 71 of the Code did not invalidate the warrant, since the expression is merely descriptive of the process and the court&#039;s jurisdiction remained intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>