<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1282 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412937</link>
    <description>A bona fide declaration filed under the wrong category in the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 did not defeat eligibility where the underlying appeal was pending on the cut-off date; the claimant was entitled to be considered under the pending-appeal category, subject to other conditions. The appellate dismissal as time barred was also unsustainable because the record showed the appeal was filed within the permissible period, so the delay refusal rested on an erroneous computation of limitation. The appellate order was quashed, the appeal restored, and the scheme claim directed to be reconsidered according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1282 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412937</link>
      <description>A bona fide declaration filed under the wrong category in the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 did not defeat eligibility where the underlying appeal was pending on the cut-off date; the claimant was entitled to be considered under the pending-appeal category, subject to other conditions. The appellate dismissal as time barred was also unsustainable because the record showed the appeal was filed within the permissible period, so the delay refusal rested on an erroneous computation of limitation. The appellate order was quashed, the appeal restored, and the scheme claim directed to be reconsidered according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>