https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412921 The Tribunal found serious lapses in justice administration by CIT(A)-11 for passing orders disregarding directions, leading to orders being set aside and remanded for fresh decision. Non-compliance with CBDT instructions by revenue authorities was deemed prejudicial to revenue, vitiating the impugned orders. The Tribunal upheld the admissibility of additional grounds raised by the Department and clarified the limited scope of powers under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed for lack of merit, affirming the Tribunal's original decision. en-us Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:21:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412921 The Tribunal found serious lapses in justice administration by CIT(A)-11 for passing orders disregarding directions, leading to orders being set aside and remanded for fresh decision. Non-compliance with CBDT instructions by revenue authorities was deemed prejudicial to revenue, vitiating the impugned orders. The Tribunal upheld the admissibility of additional grounds raised by the Department and clarified the limited scope of powers under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed for lack of merit, affirming the Tribunal's original decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412921