<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1261 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412916</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they are entitled to Cenvat Credit beyond the initial six-month period stipulated by Notification No.21/2014-CE (N.T.) for invoices issued before 01.09.2014. Citing precedents and the Delhi High Court judgment of GLOBAL CERAMICS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:21:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1261 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412916</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they are entitled to Cenvat Credit beyond the initial six-month period stipulated by Notification No.21/2014-CE (N.T.) for invoices issued before 01.09.2014. Citing precedents and the Delhi High Court judgment of GLOBAL CERAMICS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>