<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1251 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by reducing the redemption fine to 10% of the enhanced value and penalty to 5% of the enhanced value, emphasizing the need to adhere to authorization requirements for importing restricted goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision underscored the importance of neutralizing economic advantages gained from unauthorized imports and maintained consistency in applying redemption fines and penalties in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 09:20:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1251 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals by reducing the redemption fine to 10% of the enhanced value and penalty to 5% of the enhanced value, emphasizing the need to adhere to authorization requirements for importing restricted goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision underscored the importance of neutralizing economic advantages gained from unauthorized imports and maintained consistency in applying redemption fines and penalties in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>