<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1247 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412902</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the appellant did not act with the intent to evade tax, and her circumstances justified the non-payment. The penalty under Section 78A was deemed unsustainable, and the order was set aside. The appeal was allowed, recognizing the appellant&#039;s lack of malafide intent and the significant tax payments made before the Show Cause Notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1247 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412902</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the appellant did not act with the intent to evade tax, and her circumstances justified the non-payment. The penalty under Section 78A was deemed unsustainable, and the order was set aside. The appeal was allowed, recognizing the appellant&#039;s lack of malafide intent and the significant tax payments made before the Show Cause Notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>