<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1246 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412901</link>
    <description>Prior appearance, requests for time, participation in hearings, and a filed reply defeated the plea that the corporate debtor was denied a fair hearing before admission of the section 7 petition, so the natural justice objection failed. Limitation was also not a bar because the debt record showed subsequent part-payments, including a last payment in June 2018, and the recovery certificate provided a fresh basis to pursue recovery; applying Section 19 of the Limitation Act, the Tribunal held the insolvency application remained within time. The admission order under section 7 was therefore sustained and the challenge failed on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1246 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412901</link>
      <description>Prior appearance, requests for time, participation in hearings, and a filed reply defeated the plea that the corporate debtor was denied a fair hearing before admission of the section 7 petition, so the natural justice objection failed. Limitation was also not a bar because the debt record showed subsequent part-payments, including a last payment in June 2018, and the recovery certificate provided a fresh basis to pursue recovery; applying Section 19 of the Limitation Act, the Tribunal held the insolvency application remained within time. The admission order under section 7 was therefore sustained and the challenge failed on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>