<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 42 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26723</link>
    <description>The Rajmahal mining business was treated as the assessee&#039;s proprietary concern, not as part of the firm&#039;s income, because the earlier judicial finding had already held that Standard Mercantile Co., Rajmahal, belonged to the assessee individually. On that basis, the income from the business was assessable in the assessee&#039;s individual hands, and the assessments made on that footing were upheld as justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:45:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 42 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26723</link>
      <description>The Rajmahal mining business was treated as the assessee&#039;s proprietary concern, not as part of the firm&#039;s income, because the earlier judicial finding had already held that Standard Mercantile Co., Rajmahal, belonged to the assessee individually. On that basis, the income from the business was assessable in the assessee&#039;s individual hands, and the assessments made on that footing were upheld as justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>