https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297907 In second appeal, concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed by reappreciation of evidence under Section 100 CPC, so the High Court could not overturn the decree on that basis. Specific performance requires pleading and proof of continuous readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, and the plaintiff had failed to establish that requirement. A belated, unpleaded plea of part performance under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act could not be entertained, and in any event willingness to perform remained essential. The High Court's interference was therefore unsustainable, and the decree dismissing the suit for specific performance was restored. en-us Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297907 In second appeal, concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed by reappreciation of evidence under Section 100 CPC, so the High Court could not overturn the decree on that basis. Specific performance requires pleading and proof of continuous readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, and the plaintiff had failed to establish that requirement. A belated, unpleaded plea of part performance under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act could not be entertained, and in any event willingness to perform remained essential. The High Court's interference was therefore unsustainable, and the decree dismissing the suit for specific performance was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297907