https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297906 Where the Haryana Public Premises and Land (Eviction & Land Recovery) Act, 1972 entrusts the Collector with deciding whether premises are public premises and provides an appellate remedy, an erroneous classification does not make the eviction order a nullity. A civil suit seeking to invalidate such an order is barred by the express exclusion of civil court jurisdiction under Section 15. The document also notes that concurrent findings by the trial court and first appellate court that the disputed property belonged to the State and was public premises should not be displaced in second appeal on the basis of an unaccepted earlier pleading. The operative effect is that the statutory remedy must be pursued within the Act. en-us Thu, 30 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297906 Where the Haryana Public Premises and Land (Eviction & Land Recovery) Act, 1972 entrusts the Collector with deciding whether premises are public premises and provides an appellate remedy, an erroneous classification does not make the eviction order a nullity. A civil suit seeking to invalidate such an order is barred by the express exclusion of civil court jurisdiction under Section 15. The document also notes that concurrent findings by the trial court and first appellate court that the disputed property belonged to the State and was public premises should not be displaced in second appeal on the basis of an unaccepted earlier pleading. The operative effect is that the statutory remedy must be pursued within the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297906