https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412893 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling against the petitioner on various issues including the challenge to tax orders, recovery of outstanding tax demand, adequacy of assets, gross neglect by the petitioner, validity of private agreements in apportioning tax liability, and compliance with natural justice principles. The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the non-recovery of tax dues was not due to his neglect, misfeasance, or breach of duty. Private agreements were deemed invalid in allocating tax liabilities, and the Revenue was found to have taken necessary steps before pursuing the directors. The petition was dismissed without costs. en-us Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Dec 2021 14:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412893 The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling against the petitioner on various issues including the challenge to tax orders, recovery of outstanding tax demand, adequacy of assets, gross neglect by the petitioner, validity of private agreements in apportioning tax liability, and compliance with natural justice principles. The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the non-recovery of tax dues was not due to his neglect, misfeasance, or breach of duty. Private agreements were deemed invalid in allocating tax liabilities, and the Revenue was found to have taken necessary steps before pursuing the directors. The petition was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412893