<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1210 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that adjustments made by the CPC under Section 143(1) were unsustainable. It ruled that employees&#039; contributions to PF and ESI paid before the due date for filing the return should be allowed as deductions. The judgment emphasized that debatable issues should not be adjusted under Section 143(1) and highlighted the non-distinction between employees&#039; and employer&#039;s contributions under the PF Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1210 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that adjustments made by the CPC under Section 143(1) were unsustainable. It ruled that employees&#039; contributions to PF and ESI paid before the due date for filing the return should be allowed as deductions. The judgment emphasized that debatable issues should not be adjusted under Section 143(1) and highlighted the non-distinction between employees&#039; and employer&#039;s contributions under the PF Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>