<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1914 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and remitted the case back for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of providing the assessee with all relevant statements and reports, allowing cross-examination of witnesses. The decision aimed to ensure fairness in evaluating the genuineness of the capital gains claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:02:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1914 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and remitted the case back for fresh consideration, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles. The Tribunal highlighted the necessity of providing the assessee with all relevant statements and reports, allowing cross-examination of witnesses. The decision aimed to ensure fairness in evaluating the genuineness of the capital gains claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>