<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1159 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297902</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application, directing the Respondent to refund the Bank Guarantee amount and deposit it into the Corporate Debtor&#039;s account, adhering to the provisions of the IBC. The Respondent&#039;s actions were deemed in violation of the moratorium under Section 14, and the Refund Amount was classified as an asset of the Corporate Debtor during the CIRP. The application was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:02:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1159 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297902</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application, directing the Respondent to refund the Bank Guarantee amount and deposit it into the Corporate Debtor&#039;s account, adhering to the provisions of the IBC. The Respondent&#039;s actions were deemed in violation of the moratorium under Section 14, and the Refund Amount was classified as an asset of the Corporate Debtor during the CIRP. The application was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>