https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297903 The Tribunal found that the petition was filed within the limitation period based on an acknowledgment email by the respondent's Director, resetting the limitation period. The Tribunal held the respondent liable for the outstanding amount as per the Settlement Agreement and acknowledged debt in the email. The petition under Section 9 of the IBC was admitted, declaring a moratorium, appointing an IRP, and initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Tribunal directed the update of the Corporate Debtor's status on the MCA-21 site, disposing of CA No. 28 of 2018. en-us Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:02:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297903 The Tribunal found that the petition was filed within the limitation period based on an acknowledgment email by the respondent's Director, resetting the limitation period. The Tribunal held the respondent liable for the outstanding amount as per the Settlement Agreement and acknowledged debt in the email. The petition under Section 9 of the IBC was admitted, declaring a moratorium, appointing an IRP, and initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Tribunal directed the update of the Corporate Debtor's status on the MCA-21 site, disposing of CA No. 28 of 2018. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297903