<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1177 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412832</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the license fee for HR software and payments for ongoing support services did not constitute royalty under the India-Netherlands tax treaty. The tribunal rejected the AO and CIT(A)&#039;s interpretation, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in a similar case. Consequently, the interest levied under section 201(1A) for failure to deduct tax at source was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1177 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412832</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the license fee for HR software and payments for ongoing support services did not constitute royalty under the India-Netherlands tax treaty. The tribunal rejected the AO and CIT(A)&#039;s interpretation, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in a similar case. Consequently, the interest levied under section 201(1A) for failure to deduct tax at source was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>