<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1167 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412822</link>
    <description>Section 263 revision is available only where the assessment order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue. Where the Assessing Officer issues specific queries, calls for supporting documents, and examines purchase, sale, demat and bank records before accepting a loss claim, the assessment cannot be treated as one passed without enquiry or application of mind. A different view by the Principal Commissioner is not enough to justify revision, and unsupported allegations that the shares were penny stocks do not establish that the assessment was unsustainable in law. On these facts, invocation of section 263 was invalid and the revisional order lacked jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 06:58:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=657026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1167 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412822</link>
      <description>Section 263 revision is available only where the assessment order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue. Where the Assessing Officer issues specific queries, calls for supporting documents, and examines purchase, sale, demat and bank records before accepting a loss claim, the assessment cannot be treated as one passed without enquiry or application of mind. A different view by the Principal Commissioner is not enough to justify revision, and unsupported allegations that the shares were penny stocks do not establish that the assessment was unsustainable in law. On these facts, invocation of section 263 was invalid and the revisional order lacked jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>