<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 7 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26700</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the imposition of a penalty under section 273(b) of the Income-tax Act for the failure to file estimates, emphasizing that the penalty is attracted not only for non-filing of estimates but also for failure to pay advance tax. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order and ruled in favor of the assessee, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:32:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 7 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26700</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the imposition of a penalty under section 273(b) of the Income-tax Act for the failure to file estimates, emphasizing that the penalty is attracted not only for non-filing of estimates but also for failure to pay advance tax. The Court disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s order and ruled in favor of the assessee, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>