<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 374 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297875</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction cannot be used to intrude into the internal administration of a constitutional institution through intrusive interim directions that go beyond ancillary relief. The Court held that orders affecting the Public Service Commission&#039;s meetings, voting arrangements, presiding arrangements, and salaries were unsustainable and set them aside. It also held that a Commission member had no enforceable constitutional right to continue receiving facilities such as a separate chamber and allied amenities, because administrative facilities may be withdrawn when exigencies require and such withdrawal does not by itself alter protected service conditions. The appeals succeeded, the interim orders were annulled, and the writ petition failed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:08:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 374 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297875</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction cannot be used to intrude into the internal administration of a constitutional institution through intrusive interim directions that go beyond ancillary relief. The Court held that orders affecting the Public Service Commission&#039;s meetings, voting arrangements, presiding arrangements, and salaries were unsustainable and set them aside. It also held that a Commission member had no enforceable constitutional right to continue receiving facilities such as a separate chamber and allied amenities, because administrative facilities may be withdrawn when exigencies require and such withdrawal does not by itself alter protected service conditions. The appeals succeeded, the interim orders were annulled, and the writ petition failed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>