<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 684 - KARNTATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297874</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessment of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for the year 1980-1981 was invalid as the HUF had partitioned before the assessment order was passed. Section 171 did not apply as the HUF had not been previously assessed. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, invalidating the assessment made by the Income Tax Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 684 - KARNTATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297874</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessment of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for the year 1980-1981 was invalid as the HUF had partitioned before the assessment order was passed. Section 171 did not apply as the HUF had not been previously assessed. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, invalidating the assessment made by the Income Tax Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>