<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1151 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412806</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the software expenses and license fee paid by the assessee were classified as revenue expenditures. The Court considered precedents and functional tests to determine that the expenses did not provide enduring benefits but were essential for routine business operations. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the substantial questions of law were decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2021 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1151 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412806</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the software expenses and license fee paid by the assessee were classified as revenue expenditures. The Court considered precedents and functional tests to determine that the expenses did not provide enduring benefits but were essential for routine business operations. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the substantial questions of law were decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>